Just Patent Law Blog
Just EPO case law.
Pages
(Move to ...)
Home
About me
All Topics
Archive
Search (mobile site)
Subscribe to updates
▼
29 September 2025
T 0089/23 - A sensible interpretation of Art. 13(1) RPBA
›
Key points "The board does not interpret Article 13(1) RPBA as requiring an amended claim set to overcome all objections raised by ano...
26 September 2025
T2328/22 - Res judicata against the intervenor
›
Key points In the first appeal, the Board decided to maintain the patent in amended form with a description to be adapted, and remitted the ...
25 September 2025
T 0928/23 - Can a claim be novel over itself?
›
Key points D3: EP14306121.6 ( EP 2 965 760 A1 ) is a prior right under Art. 54(3) having as claim 1: composition comprising : - an effective...
24 September 2025
T 0933/23 - The boundary between functional features and results-to-be-achieved
›
Key points The Examining Division rejected the claims under Art. 84. The Board: "The feature of "allowing a radial displacement...
2 comments:
22 September 2025
T 1472/22 - Newly asserting a public prior use in appeal
›
Key points This decision was issued already in January 2025, but it still a remarkable one. The opponent included a new public prior use att...
1 comment:
19 September 2025
T 0387/25 - EPO Customer Service tickets and the electronic file
›
Key points The Board confirms that if the drawings are omitted from the Druckexamplar by the EPO by mistake with an unmarked change, an appe...
18 September 2025
T 0697/22 - G 1/25 referral - Adaption of the description
›
Key points Old news, but for completeness' sake: questions about the need to adapt the description to the allowable amended claims were ...
7 comments:
‹
›
Home
View web version