Just Patent Law Blog
Just EPO case law.
Pages
(Move to ...)
Home
About me
All Topics
Archive
Search (mobile site)
Subscribe to updates
▼
30 June 2025
T 0667/23 - A difference no matter how small
›
Key points "D1/D1a discloses an alloy C1 falling within the scope of claim 1 except that alloy C1 contains 1.00 wt.% Si. The opponents...
27 June 2025
T 0509/22 - Technical effect not mentioned, G 2/21 still complied with
›
Key points The Board, in translation: " It is correct that these effects - improvement in lubrication performance and leak detection - ...
1 comment:
26 June 2025
R 0006/21 - Clearing the backlog
›
Key points The EBA is currently clearing its backlog of petition for review cases. Which means that it had to finally issue a decision in th...
25 June 2025
T 2497/22 - Putting the effect in the claim and a claim feature in the OTP
›
Key points On the EQE, you are thaught to include no pointers to the solution in the objective technical problem. Claim 1 in this case: ...
1 comment:
23 June 2025
T 1574/23 - GL examples on inventive step
›
Key points The Board: " The appellant's [applicant's] view is however correct in this respect. The platform of D3 is clearly l...
20 June 2025
T 0002/23 - On the basis of the prior art provided
›
Key points This case is about exceptional circumstances under Art. 13(2) (admitted) and a non-obvious alternative (also acknowledged) The re...
18 June 2025
T 1913/21 - The claim says 'use of', but is it a use claim?
›
Key points More precisely, is the following claim a valid second non-medical use claim in the sense of G 2/88: "Use of an inhibitor of...
2 comments:
‹
›
Home
View web version