Just Patent Law Blog
Just EPO case law.
Pages
(Move to ...)
Home
About me
All Topics
Archive
Search (mobile site)
Subscribe to updates
▼
28 February 2023
T 0956/19 (I) - (I) No interruption of opposition period
›
Key points In edited machine translation: " Appellant I [the patentee] submits in its appeal that the oppositions of Opponents 1 and 2 ...
27 February 2023
T 2303/19 - The optimum format for oral proceedings
›
Key points "The appellant's reasons for requesting that the oral proceedings take place by videoconference were two-fold. Firstly,...
24 February 2023
T 2604/18 - Second insufficiency attack is new ground for opposition ?
›
Key points The Board does not admit an objection of insufficient disclosure against claims 2 and 3. "2.4 In as far as the appellant [o...
23 February 2023
T 1213/19 - (II) The right to be heard and amended claims
›
Key points I present the following reasoning of the Board without comments, except for a rhetorical question: does the right to be heard und...
22 February 2023
T 2502/19 - The broadest possible or objectively reasonable construction
›
Key points In this examination appeal, the Board raises a clarity objection: " it would not be clear for the skilled reader how the met...
3 comments:
20 February 2023
T 0699/19 - Novelty of 2nd medical use claims
›
Key points The issue is whether the 2nd medical use claim at issue is novel over D3. D3 is WO 2004/096122 and is a prior right. Incidentally...
17 February 2023
T 1776/18 - (IV) Review of the OD's decision
›
Key points "The patent proprietor filed auxiliary request 4A at the oral proceedings before the Opposition Division, which decided not ...
‹
›
Home
View web version